[link]
Now what's this? What's so artsy about those pics? Alright, I got it that they wanted to complain about the "border" between artistic nude pics and pornography. Alright, I can accept that a lot of similar deviations are posted daily on DA. But a DD for them? There are a lot more GREAT deviations on DA that are worth the DD! Or maybe the DD was granted cause what the artist wrote in the description? Cause they were just too sick to hear complaints from the other artists about their "art" pieces? Don't get me wrong.. I like artistic nude pics, but can you even call these two DDed pics artistic?
Though if you saw their gallery, some may be called artistic, really. But a damn DD for those pieces?? Come onnnn!!!
Read also:
[link]
[link]
[link]